Date: 11-23-2009
Time: 4:54 am
Department of Aviation
Time: 4:54 am
Service Area
Financial Assistance for Airport Maintenance
Objective
Provide financial assistance for airport maintenance
1 of 16
Measure
Ratio of airport maintenance grants expended to the value of allocations awarded.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
The measure is a ratio of maintenance grants expended to the value of allocations awarded during the fiscal year.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Output
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
85
Date
6/30/2010
Description
85% in FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
The performance of this financial assistance program improved 14 percentage points during FY 2009, after having been frozen in the previous fiscal year due to revenue shortfalls.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 94 |
| 2007 | 100 |
| 2008 | 64 |
| 2009 | 78 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Financial Assistance for Airport Development
Objective
We will provide financial assistance for airport development
2 of 16
Measure
Ratio of airport development grants executed to the value of allocations available.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
The measure is ratio of grants executed to the value of allocations available to be put under grant during the FY.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
92
Date
6/30/2010
Description
92% for FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
Due to current economic conditions, localities were less able during FY 2009 to dedicate funds for local share to support airport capital improvement projects resulting in grant executions being less than projected.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 1995 | 52.3 |
| 1996 | 64.0 |
| 1997 | 65.4 |
| 1998 | 56.6 |
| 1999 | 63.5 |
| 2000 | 58.2 |
| 2001 | 82.2 |
| 2002 | 87.1 |
| 2003 | 81.0 |
| 2004 | 72.5 |
| 2005 | 85.7 |
| 2006 | 84.1 |
| 2007 | 87.0 |
| 2008 | 93.0 |
| 2009 | 89.2 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Financial Assistance for Aviation Promotion
Objective
Provide financial assistance for aviation promotion activities
3 of 16
Measure
Ratio of aviation promotion grants executed to the value of allocations available.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
This measure is a ratio of grants executed to allocations available to be put under grant during the FY.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
100
Date
6/30/2010
Description
100% in FY 2010..
Explanatory Note
The performance of this financial assistance program improved 25 percentage points during FY 2009 after having been frozen during FY 2008 due to revenue shortfalls.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 85 |
| 2007 | 100 |
| 2008 | 75 |
| 2009 | 100 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Aviation Licensing and Regulation
Objective
License aircraft and airports in accordance with the Code of Virginia
4 of 16
Measure
Percentage of eligible FAA-registered aircraft that are licensed per Code of Virginia requirements
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
DOAV internal records.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
75
Date
6/30/2010
Description
75% in FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
A new compliance Manager was hired in August 2008, and she analyzed data to determine aircraft eligible to be licensed and executed strategies to increase rate of compliance by 28 percentage points over the prior fiscal year.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 52 |
| 2007 | 51 |
| 2008 | 43 |
| 2009 | 71 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Aviation Communication and Education
Objective
We will increase Aviation Awareness/Utilization
5 of 16
Measure
Number of people exposed to Virginia Aviation by DOAV activities.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Attendance data will be provided by major event sponsors and DOAV internal records.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
1300000
Date
12/31/2009
Description
1.3 million in calendar year 2009.
Explanatory Note
Performance is measured on a calendar year basis. Due to current budget/travel restrictions, the Department of Aviation will not participate in 2009 in as many external events as in previous years. We also anticipate a decline in total event attendance due to the cancellation of some of the scheduled events.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 1,100,000 |
| 2007 | 1,067,400 |
| 2008 | 1,108,027 |
| 2009 | |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Aviation Communication and Education
Objective
We will increase Aviation Awareness/Utilization
6 of 16
Measure
Amount of economic activity generated by Virginia's aviation system.
Last Modified: 31-Jul-09
Measure Methodology
Data will be produced by consultant analysis.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
12.2
Date
12/31/2009
Description
$12.2 billion in calendar year 2009.
Explanatory Note
This activity has not been measured since 2004. Following a 2008 deferral of the study due to revenue shortfalls, DOAV is currently evaluating consultant proposals and expects to have economic activity data in Fall 2010.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 10,700,000,000 |
| 2005 | |
| 2006 | |
| 2007 | |
| 2008 | |
| 2009 | |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Aviation Communication and Education
Objective
We will increase Aviation Awareness/Utilization
7 of 16
Measure
Number of enplanements at the air carrier airports (having scheduled service).
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Enplanement numbers are provided by FAA. These figures become available approximately July-August for the previous calendar year.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
27100000
Date
12/31/2009
Description
27.1 million enplanements during calendar year 2009
Explanatory Note
Enplanements declined by 1.1 Million statewide, resulting in a reduction of 4.3%. The current economy has seen a national downturn of enplanements.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 26,100,000 |
| 2006 | 24,600,000 |
| 2007 | 25,600,000 |
| 2008 | 24,500,000 |
| 2009 | |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Aviation Communication and Education
Objective
Develop and administer Aviation/Aerospace Education programs
8 of 16
Measure
Number of organizations/educational institutions reached through the Aviation/Aerospace Education Program.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
DOAV internal records.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
2750
Date
6/30/2010
Description
2,750 during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
In order to accomodate revenue shortfalls, we had to reduce the quantity of print material produced and distributed to organizations and educational institutions. We increased our emphasis in other contact media but the lack of printed material resulted in contacts with fewer institutions.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 2,700 |
| 2007 | 2,700 |
| 2008 | 2,750 |
| 2009 | 2,750 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
General Aviation Personnel Development
Objective
Increase safety awareness among Virginia pilots to create a safer aviation environment in the Commonwealth
9 of 16
Measure
Number of aviation safety events sponsored by the Department.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Sponsored events are recorded by the Department of Aviation
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
11
Date
6/30/2010
Description
11 events during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
Due to cancellations of the FAA Wings program and the 99s safety program, DOAV did not sponsor as many safety seminars during FY 2009 as anticipated. Talks have been initiated with other organizations to possibly introduce new safety events during FY 2010.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 11 |
| 2007 | 11 |
| 2008 | 7 |
| 2009 | 9 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Air Transportation Planning and Development
Objective
Provide technical support to the Commonwealth's airports
10 of 16
Measure
Number of airport security inspections performed.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
DOAV internal reports.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Maintain
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
35
Date
6/30/2010
Description
35 inspections during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
We were able to meet our goal efficently by combining security, safety and operational inspections.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 35 |
| 2007 | 45 |
| 2008 | 35 |
| 2009 | 38 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Air Transportation Planning and Development
Objective
Provide technical support to the Commonwealth's airports
11 of 16
Measure
Number of airport safety inspections performed using state and federal criteria.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
DOAV internal reports.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Maintain
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
30
Date
6/30/2010
Description
30 inspections during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
We were able to meet our goal efficently by combining security, safety and operational inspections.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 28 |
| 2007 | 42 |
| 2008 | 31 |
| 2009 | 33 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Air Transportation Planning and Development
Objective
Provide technical support to the Commonwealth's airports
12 of 16
Measure
Percentage of time that the Department-owned electronic navigational equipment are not available for service
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Measure is a ratio of facility down-time to total time available during the fiscal year. Navigational aid facility logs are maintained by contractor in accordance with FAA requirements.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Down
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
.9
Date
6/30/2010
Description
.9% during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
We met our goal and the Navigational Facility study is due to be completed late CY 2009, which will provide up-to-date information regarding material condition of state system and recommendations for future statewide system configurations. Some outdated navigational systems will be decommissioned because of age and maintainability which will further improve our system readiness.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1.4 |
| 2000 | 1.3 |
| 2001 | 0.8 |
| 2002 | 0.8 |
| 2003 | 1.1 |
| 2004 | 0.9 |
| 2005 | 0.7 |
| 2006 | 0.9 |
| 2007 | 0.9 |
| 2008 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | 0.9 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Air Transportation Planning and Development
Objective
Provide technical support to the Commonwealth's airports
13 of 16
Measure
Condition rating of pavement in airports across the Commonwealth.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Pavement condition index analysis in accordance with FAA criteria.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Maintain
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
70
Date
6/30/2012
Description
Rating of 70 by June 30, 2012.
Explanatory Note
DOAV met our goal this year as DOAV Maintenance program funds were sufficient to maintain current PCI level. To improve the PCI requires Federal funds to perform pavement rehabilitation. These funds are forecast to decrease in future years.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 70 |
| 2003 | |
| 2004 | |
| 2005 | |
| 2006 | |
| 2007 | |
| 2008 | |
| 2009 | 70 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
State Aircraft Acquisition or Enhancement
Objective
Implement and fund an approved asset replacement program
14 of 16
Measure
Percent of days aircraft is available for flights
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
The measure is a percentage of days the aircraft is available for flight in an operating year.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
86
Date
6/30/2010
Description
86% during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
The department's aging aircraft fleet was replaced in FY 2008. Since then, the two new replacement aircraft have experienced a higher than anticipated degree of unavailability, primarily a result of problems with the environmental systems. Warranty has covered the costs but not eliminated the downtime. The manufacturer continues to try to resolve the problems.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 79 |
| 2007 | 81 |
| 2008 | 82 |
| 2009 | 82 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
State Aircraft Operations and Maintenance
Objective
Provide safe, efficient air transportation for the Governor, Legislature, Economic Development Partnership, and all state agencies
15 of 16
Measure
Percent (%) of customer satisfaction rated satisfied or better.
Last Modified: 01-Jan-08
Measure Methodology
Completed customer surveys.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Maintain
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
95
Date
6/30/2010
Description
95% during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
96% of customers were satisfied with DOAV executive flight services, with 87% reporting being very satisfied during FY 2009.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2006 | |
| 2007 | 100 |
| 2008 | 99 |
| 2009 | 96 |
| 2010 |
Service Area
Administrative and Support Services
Objective
Ensure that resources are used efficiently and programs are managed effectively, and in a manner consistent with applicable state and federal requirements
16 of 16
Measure
Percent of scorecard categories marked as "meets expectations".
Last Modified: 25-Jul-08
Measure Methodology
Take the number of cases where the agency scored "meets expectations" and divide by the total number of measures.
Measure Type
Preferred Trend
Class
Measure Baseline
Outcome
Preferred Trend
Up
Class
Non-Key
Value
Date
Description
Measure Target
Target
100
Date
6/30/2010
Description
100% during FY 2010.
Explanatory Note
The Department received a Below Expectations rating in one of thirteen administrative measures, "Percent of compliance with information security standards," due to the lack of an IT Security Audit Plan. The plan has subsequently been completed, along with additional actions designed to improve the agency's IT security program.
Measure Data
| Year | Measure |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 100 |
| 2006 | 100 |
| 2007 | 100 |
| 2008 | 90 |
| 2009 | 92 |
| 2010 |